News on SA Clothing Sector

Loading...

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

RESPONSE TO SACTWU’S AWARDING OF ‘WORST EMPLOYER AWARD’ TO NEWCASTLE CHINESE EMPLOYERS

PRESS STATEMENT

Prepared and released by The ReDress Consultancy on behalf of the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Date: 5 October 2010
The ReDress Consultancy:
Cell: 083 943 0235
Email: redresssa@webstorm.co.za
Web: http://www.redressconsultancy.blogspot.com/


Mr. Alex Liu: Cell: 083 7758329

Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry


RESPONSE TO SACTWU’S AWARDING OF ‘WORST EMPLOYER AWARD’ TO NEWCASTLE CHINESE EMPLOYERS


We acknowledge the “award” that the Southern African Clothing and Textiles Workers’ Union bestowed upon the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce at their 11th National Congress, which was recently held in Cape Town. However, we are disappointed at the way the press statement released by Sactwu on 26 September 2010 has branded Chinese-South African’s in a negative way that further polarizes South Africa’s diverse ethnic population.

We feel that it is imperative to respond to some of the accusations made in Sactwu’s press statement of 26 September 2010. To brand the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce as “employers who break down, not build decent work in the clothing industry” is inaccurate. Throughout the entire process of talking to and negotiating with the Bargaining Council and Sactwu, which only began in late August of 2010 we have been transparent, honest and have continually stated that we wish to find an equable solution for employers, employees and for the South African clothing industry.

Our involvement in the clothing industry has created much needed employment in Newcastle. The Chinese Chamber of Commerce has 115 members with only 45 members being involved in the clothing sector representing approximately 2500 workers not the “4000” stated by the union. We believe the union has got its facts confused as they had initially engaged with the Newcastle Chinese Clothing & Textile Association in September 2009 and not with our chamber. It must also be stated that there are currently 358 clothing companies in the whole of South Africa that are targeted by the Bargaining Council for not paying minimum wages. According to the Bargaining Council, the worst paying employer in South Africa is not a Chinese company.

At our initial meeting with the union, we placed on record our willingness and intention of creating a ‘disciplinary committee’ that would have external moderators and evaluators to ensure that our members comply with the outcome of the current negotiations. When we discovered that members of the Newcastle Chinese Clothing & Textile Association were paying unacceptable wages, we immediately distanced ourselves from them. Subsequently, all negotiations with the Bargaining Council and the union by the Chinese Chamber of Commerce have been only for its members and no other party. We have however joined other employer associations in South Africa to submit a new wage proposal to the Bargaining Council as was requested by the Department of Labor.

We are perturbed when the union states in its press release, “employment creation in the clothing industry cannot be based on slave wages.” First, there needs to be a clear definition by the union to the meaning of “slave wages,” and secondly we have never had any intention to exploit Newcastle’s community. We have stated the various reasons why we cannot afford the current legislated wages and these reasons have been widely published in the media. In this regard it must once again be mentioned that more than half of all the companies registered with the Bargaining Council do not pay the minimum wages. This is a sure indication that the whole wage structure of the clothing industry in South Africa is wrong.

We are perplexed with the union’s accusation that “clothing sector member companies of this Chamber pay a machinist between R180 and R280 a week.” According to our information, our members are paying between R250 and R550 a week for a qualified machinist. We would like the union to please provide us with the evidence as to where they got those figures and to identify the factories so that we can confirm if the companies that the union accuses are members of our Chamber.

We would also like to dispel the misrepresentation the union has placed on the Chinese community in Newcastle that we are only here to exploit the local workers. A large number of our members are South African citizens and we have shown our commitment to our country by trying to keep our factories open under extremely difficult conditions and thereby assisting in job creation and poverty alleviation. Over the past three years, our members have also engaged in a number of Corporate Social Responsibility projects.

• In 2008 one of our members assisted in the upgrading of Newcastle’s traffic lights by donating 154 LED traffic lights.

• Our Chamber has donated 10 PCs to schools and a NGO in the community.

• Sponsored our local SAPS Christmas parties for police widows and orphans and continue to provide our local police force with food parcels for them to distribute to our community.

• In 2009, our members gave donations to Amitofo Care Centre, which cares for more than 350 orphans.

• Our temple has donated more than 150 wheel chairs to a Newcastle based school for the disabled.

• The annual Dragon Festival, which is celebrated by the Chinese community, attracts many visitors, which in turn provides income-generating opportunities for the business community of Newcastle.

• The Chinese Tzu-Chi Foundations assists with food parcel deliveries within our community. During May and June this year, the Tzu-Chi Foundation distributed more than 1000 food parcels.

• In August this year, one of our members won the ‘Productivity Award’ for the KwaZulu-Natal region and will be going on to compete for the national award in October.

• We have plans to build a kitchen and fence for Ncandu combined school.

Are these the actions of a community that intends to exploit South Africans? As a community, we are, extremely aggrieved that the union has unfairly discriminated against our Chamber and its members.

Our intentions and those of our members is to find an equable solution to the current impasse over reasonable wages considering the extremely difficult and challenging environment we are faced to operate in. The South African clothing sector has seen the closure of dozens of factories and the loss of thousands of jobs over the past few years. Can the union, the industry, the country and South African people afford further losses because of the inflexibility of finding a solution around a marginal difference in wages?

Furthermore, if our members are forced to close or even relocate to other African countries can the union guarantee that their members who will join the ranks of the unemployed be able to find new employment within the sector. -ENDS-

Messages of support
 
4th October 2010

Dear Alex

The Newcastle Sakekamer Exco discussed the challenges facing the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce, our sister chamber in NBU (Newcastle Business Unity), at length at our last meeting. It has been unanimously agreed that the NCCC has played an important role in the creation of jobs in our town where we face 54% unemployment according to figures provided by the Local Municipality. We appreciate the role that the NCCC play in our community and your assurance that all members are willing to commit to a sustainable wage structure that will ensure job security in our town is appreciated and you can rely on the full support of the Newcastle Sakekamer.

We also acknowledge the role that the NCCC play in the upliftment of our communities and your generous contribution towards community based projects and organisations is noted. We realise that extra effort was put in during the past few years to change negative perceptions of the broader community towards the role of the NCCC members and it is a pity that the press release of SACTWU could undo a lot of hard work done.

We wish the NCCC the best in your deliberations and trust that an amicable solution, in the interest of all parties and within the ambits of the LRA and BCEA will be found.

Kind regards
Ben Chowles
President, Newcastle Sakekamer 2010/2011
Mobile: +27 83 656 1535
Fax: +27 34 312 1555
ben@newcastle.co.za




5 October 2010

The Newcastle Chamber of Commerce and Industry (NCCI) will request SACTWU to retract it’s labelling of the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (NCCCI) the “worst employer”. We believe such actions do nothing to address the very serious issues currently being experienced. We also recognise the numerous initiatives taken by the NCCCI towards uplifting the Newcastle community and thereby bettering the lives of all our people.

Further unemployment created by the closure of factories in and around Newcastle will have a massive impact on the already strained local economy.

Furthermore, the NCCI welcomes the sanction/reprieve by the Economic Development Minister to keep the factories operating until end December.

The NCCI acknowledges that a proposal has already been made to SACTWU by the NCCCI, KZN CMT Forum, Free State Clothing Manufacturers Association and the Apparel Manufacturers of South Africa.

We implore all stakeholders to engage objectively and finally present a new sector accord which will have addressed the needs of the Employers, the Employees and the Communities in which they operate.

John L McGregor
President

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Read the article- union looking for scapegoat to hide real issues. Hoskin group firing own union members is what they are hiding at intimate apparel. ‘broken brick award’ was the award union should have given themselves.
Nothing more than a bunch of gangsters milking honest wage earners under the guise of human rights.
Encountered this problem while trying to promote our product in New York several years ago. Everybody wanted their palm greased before anything was done.
All this exposure in the media will shed light to their TRUE AGENDA, the public is waking up and starting to express their anger. Business Day articles proof of this.
Fast forward- we will succeed.

Your blogs are awakening the public to the real truth.

Anonymous said...

The SA Clothing and Textile Workers’ Union (Sactwu) on Monday said despite a decrease in the number of job losses in the industry, it remains under stress.


It recorded a 23 percent drop over the last three years.


More than 29,000 people were retrenched between 2007 and 2010 compared to the 38,000 during the previous three-year period.


Sactwu’s Etienne Vlok said the industry is still feeling the pinch.


“Losing almost 30,000 jobs over three years is an enormous amount of jobs,” said Vlok.


Volk added they are aware of several Cape Town factories which are struggling.


“We are using things such as the training lay-off scheme to ensure that the jobs are not lost but that we can place workers in some kind of training lay-off until the company improves and they can employ the workers on a full-time basis again."
(5th October 2010)
Eyewitness News

Anonymous said...

The SA Clothing and Textile Workers’ Union (Sactwu) on Monday said despite a decrease in the number of job losses in the industry, it remains under stress.


It recorded a 23 percent drop over the last three years.


More than 29,000 people were retrenched between 2007 and 2010 compared to the 38,000 during the previous three-year period.


Sactwu’s Etienne Vlok said the industry is still feeling the pinch.


“Losing almost 30,000 jobs over three years is an enormous amount of jobs,” said Vlok.


Volk added they are aware of several Cape Town factories which are struggling.


“We are using things such as the training lay-off scheme to ensure that the jobs are not lost but that we can place workers in some kind of training lay-off until the company improves and they can employ the workers on a full-time basis again."
(5th October 2010)
Eyewitness News

Anonymous said...

I am more than happy to pay more, if you are welling to work efficiently and ethically. Which is not the case in SA. Ask yourself for better skills and attitudes before asking for higher wages. Business owners pay workers to get tasks done and generating values. But not sitting your time in. Wake up! Union! Do something to improve productivity, not just asking for money. Carry on with your toghness, your are killing your own members' jobs.

Anonymous said...

Well done sactwu!!! you have managed to loose more jobs if you are lucky the whole industry will close down.Oh man what a victory!!And for us the public cheap clothing from India,China,Pakistan,Indonesia ( our trading partners )

i am sure these factory owners are not making super profits , a fact the bargaining council could easily verify .so where will the money come fron for higher wages ? they will just close . make economics compulsory subject at schools !!

Here is an idea. If the businesses close due to uncompetitive wages get COSATU/ SACTWU to guarantee the workers jobs.... obviously only decent jobs

It is so easy for the bargaining council officials to demand compliance to minimum wage - they go home to a nice house and big dinner every afternoon. Push wages up and these marginal businesses will be forced to lay off workers, or even shut down completely. Ask the factory workers if they would rather be able to buy half a loaf of bread with the job they have, or no bread at all if their employer has to retrench them, or close his factory. Of course it is far more important to uphold the rules, than to allow people to earn a wage...

Anonymous said...

irony is that to compete, factories should actually consider automation on large scale, which increase the need for skilled operators, will improve the wages of the best - but do nothing for the unskilled..however this is not unique for this type of industry

This is what happens when government and trades unions interfere with business (job creators).
A solution to this is "Malema"ise the business, nationalise it. After all, "the revolution" is about siezing the means of production and putting the workers in control...(ROTFLMAO).
These business people will close those factories, putting those people out of work and COSATU will be jubiliant about their victory over the "capitalist exploiters".
Another thing: Johann Baard says "and still outperform factories in mainland China" ???? Yeah right, So the South African worker is out on strike for (say) three weeks in a year...and we still outperform the Chinese? They built the great wall of China and we have the Zimbabwe ruins.....go figure
ref M&G 3 0ct 2010

Anonymous said...

Tariffs. All government interference distorts markets and all government intervention results in unintended consequences and all consequences are adverse.
For example, a Government fixing the price of bread will eventually be confronted by bread riots.
The communist slave masters in Vietnam set the price of rice artificially low (to benefit the hungrey populace?). The farmers stopped producing unprofitable rice and concentrated their efforts elsewhere. Vietnam became a net importer of rice. ???When the communists finally came to their senses and stopped interfering in peoples lives the price of rice went back to it's proper level (willing buyer willing seller) and Vietnam became a net rice exporter.
Government interference and trades unions destroy jobs wholesale
M&G 8 oct 2010